Recommendations for transitioning countries
Many donors and countries are in the process of transitioning away from reliance on external funding in favour of greater domestic investment for HIV. This process, in itself, carries grave risks to the funding for, and implementation of, HIV programming, especially for key populations. Recent experiences in Central and Eastern Europe provide examples of this.
But planning and implementing transitions are not straightforward. There are many questions about when countries should transition, how they should do so, and whether or not donor exits will leave critical gaps in the response, especially for key populations.
This policy paper suggests that transitions need to be based on the following sets of principles and is structured in 3 parts, based on them:
(1) transparency and predictability,
(2) good practice and
(3) human rights.
The Key messages of the paper, according to those principles, are:
To aid in the transparency and predictability of transition processes, we need:
- Systematic transition criteria: A clear set of criteria needs to be developed for assessment of a country’s transition preparedness.
- Publicly available transition schedules: Transition should be discussed between donors and representatives of the country to determine start and end dates and duration of transition.
- Coordinated donor decisions: Donors need a clearer mechanism to communicate their transition plans about a particular country with each other.
“Good practice” transitions require:
- Time: Not only is a period of several (5-10) years required, but also a phased roadmap to achieve various specified financial and operational targets is needed.
- High-level political commitment: Without commitment at the highest political levels, transitions can be easily derailed by changes in staffing, in political parties, in economic circumstances, etc.
- Country ownership: Aligning donor-funded projects with national policy as well as with the national context is important if projects are to be absorbed by domestic bill-payers.
- Built-in monitoring and evaluation: M&E is needed to assess progress against the roadmap targets, as well as to track changes to the epidemic, issues affecting the testing and treatment cascade, access by key populations to essential services, and other important considerations.
Transitions that promote and protect human rights are most likely to maintain and expand access to essential HIV services by key populations through:
- Funding mechanisms for NGOs, which must be in place and working effectively to enable access to sufficient funds for key population service delivery programs.
- High-level political engagement, specifically related to the costs and benefits of excluding or including specific key populations in national HIV responses.
- Improved in-country capacity for advocacy based on data collection and analysis by NGOs or community-based networks representing each relevant key population.
- Increased capacity of NGOs to demonstrate specifically the level and types of activities they will undertake in the HIV prevention and treatment cascade to justify the sustained allocation.
- Ensured funding for police, security, and criminal justice reform programs because these structural elements have the strongest influence in most countries over access of key populations to needed services.
You can look through and download the full text of the paper here.
Global Fund funding opportunity – COVID-19 Response MechanismThe COVID-19 Response Mechanism (C19RM), approved in April 2020, authorizes US$500 million in funding in addition to grant flexibilities. C19RM can be used across the three diseases and the health system, even if a country only has a single Global Fund grant for one component. The CCM will assess the most urgent needs and direct […] Read more
COVID-related Funding Opportunities for Civil Society Working on HIV, TB, Malaria, Gender and Human RightsWe would like to share with you the information about few COVID-related Funding Opportunities available for Civil Society Working on HIV, TB, Malaria, Gender and Human Rights in EECA. Post Views: 2,655 Read more
Global Fund Donors Pledge US$14 Billion in Fight to End EpidemicsLYON, France –In an unprecedented show of global solidarity, donors at the Global Fund’s Sixth Replenishment Conference pledged US$14.02 billion for the next three years – the largest amount ever raised for a multilateral health organization, and the largest amount by the Global Fund. The funds will help save 16 million lives and end the epidemics […] Read more
C19RM Financial Support opportunities for civil society
C19RM Technical Support opportunities for civil society
EECA Regional Platform COVID Alert System
If you are aware about any COVID-related issues which have impacted the work of the Global Fund supported HIV and TB programs in your country – please complete the form and provide us with any of such information.
Regional Platform – EECA
This web-resource is a part of new regional communication and coordination project “Regional Civil Society and Community Support, Coordination and Communication Platform - EECA”, implemented by Eurasian Harm Reduction Association (EHRA).
The Global Fund Board approved the Strategy Framework for 2023-2028 29.07.2021 21:20